Many marriage therapists use the concept of emotional bank accounts as a way of helping couples understand the process of framing an interaction between couples. If you generally have a negative feeling towards your mate you will read behavior through a negative lens. Such as…If you have a negative emotional bank account towards your spouse then the garbage not being taken out is a sign of their lack of love and care towards me. If you have a positive emotional bank account towards your spouse then the same action simply becomes framed as a missed chore, most likely an innocent oversight.
What is interesting to me is that this is exactly what I am seeing play out in the political sound bites. I am appalled at what people will say about someone when that person is not sitting in front of them. That some how because they are running for office they have the right to have their personhood attacked. Their emotional bank account towards that person/party is so low that they frame every word that comes out of their mouth as negative, stupid, bad…evil. Republicans do it, Democrats do it, Independents do it…and it is really wearing me down. We want our political candidiates to talk about the issues, tells us specifics however we critique people not ideas. Maybe if we truly critiqued ideas and held each person as valuable and treated them with respect and dignity we would finally see a change in the tide. The level of contempt in politics is disgusting. Why can’t we say things like…”I am sure (Obama, McCain, Biden or Palin) is a great parent, good person, doing her/his best to impact this world positively and I am sure she/he believes her/his ideas will work however I disagree with her/his specifics ideas of how to get there.” Rather than calling her/him names like a junoir high student. Many people like to throw around the phrase…Be the change you want to see…well if you want less contemptuous and negative politics then change the way you talk about the candidates in your local coffeeshops, pubs, faith communities, community centers, local papers etc.
I was in Fred Meyers a few weeks ago and was shopping for some sweatshirts and I got verbally blasted with one woman’s views of a particular politician. We happened to be standing at the same clothing rack and out of the blue she just let loose and through her tone and verbal attacks it was clear that if I disagreed with her I would have gotten an earful and it would not have been pretty. I kept my mouth shut, knowing this woman had no desire to agree to disagree or have an open dialogue about ideas, she simply wanted to attack this candidate to the core. I quickly walked away and could hear her move on to her next victim. This example is the most brash I have experienced, most others are more socially savvy and can dilute their contempt but it’s there none the less.
I appreciate that there is a lot at stake in this political year, I understand the issues are hard and complex, and I want good, thoughtful, and passionate dialogue…I need that to help me make my undecided vote. What I feel like I overwhelmingly get are conversations that make me want to disengage…so I just avoid them. It’s pretty sad when I would rather talk about my money or sex life (but I won’t) than my politcal choices. I really am looking forward to November 5!